George H. Morrison - Devotional Sermons
Devotional For
September 27
Rhoda
And as Peter knocked at the door of the
gate, a maid came to hearken, named Rhoda. And when she knew Peter's voice, she
opened not the gate for gladness, but ran in, and told how Peter stood before
the gate--Act 12:13-14
Her Name Meant "Rose" and She
Was One Indeed
In visiting a sickroom where there is so
much that speaks of suffering one is often met by a single spot of brightness. It
is a flower that has been brought by loving hands to gladden and refresh the
weary sufferer. The room is darkened to shut out the sunlight which might beat
too fiercely on the aching head. The nurse as she moves upon her tender
ministry does so with a noiseless footstep. Everything is quiet and subdued,
suggestive of days and nights of anguish, save it may be one rose of perfect
loveliness that opens its petals beside the sufferer's couch.
In some such way in this chapter of the
Acts do we light on Rhoda, and Rhoda means a rose. She blossoms here in the
presence of much suffering and glows like a flame of brightness in the gloom.
The chapter opens with the death of James and with the imprisonment of Simon
Peter. It closes with the tragic death of Herod when he was smitten of God in
the midst of his great pomp. And it is in that environment of gloom, with the
shadow on it of suffering and death, that we light on Rhoda--that is, Rose--and
whose name is fragrant as a rose until this hour. Rhoda is no great lady
playing a mighty part. We never hear of her before or after. And yet I think
that God has set her here and given her an immortality she never looked for,
not for her own sake but for ours, that we might be better because she has
been.
A Servant Who Partook in Family Worship
In the first place, then, we shall observe
that she shared in the devotions of the family. She was as eagerly interested
in Simon Peter as anyone who was in the house that night. It is probable that
Mary was in comfortable circumstances and that her home was a roomy and
well-appointed one. She was the aunt of Barnabas, and Barnabas was a wealthy
man who had had great possessions in the isle of Cyprus. And then we read that
on this eventful night there was a large company in Mary's house, and that
would point to it as a roomy dwelling, as of one who was in comfortable
circumstances. We may take it, then, that in the home of Mary, Rhoda was not an
only servant. She was one of several; she held an inferior place; it is likely
that the other slaves would all be men. Yet here we find her at worship with
the household, taking a share in their unceasing prayers, and overborne by a
very tide of gladness when she heard the voice of Peter at the gate.
Mistress and Slave on Their Knees
Together
Now there is one thing we must be on our
guard against when we think of slavery in the ancient world. We must never
carry into our thoughts of Jewish slavery the stories we have read of Greek and
Roman slavery. A Roman was often very cruel to his slaves; it was very seldom
that a Jew was that. There lingered in Jewry the older and kindlier feeling of
the household of patriarchal times. And yet granting all that, as we must grant
it if we have an eye for the hand of God in history, do you not think we have
here in Mary's household a trace of the growing influence of Jesus? It is only
eleven years since the resurrection, yet what a beautiful Christian home is
this one. The mistress is still the mistress in the dwelling and the slave has
not yet ceased to be a slave. Yet something of a common sisterhood has touched
them; in their deepest and dearest they are united now; they have sat at the
Table of the Lord together, and together they have prayed through the long
night. That is how Jesus handled social problems. He was never a wild and
reckless revolutionary. He never came to Mary and said, "You must let
Rhoda go: it is against the law of God to have a slave." What He did do
was to draw into sweet sisterhood the mistress and the menial at her gate; to
fill up the gulf with His redeeming love until you find them on their knees
together.
Nevertheless Rhoda Performed Her Common
Duties
Once more let us notice about Rhoda that
she was not above her common duties. It was her task, as we say in Scotland, to
mind the door, and our story tells us that she did it faithfully. In Jewish
households, let me say in passing, it was generally a female slave who had this
work to do. In our wealthier homes, I know not why, this duty is generally
given to a manservant. But even among the wealthiest of the Jews and when every
other servant was a man, the office of attending to the door was invariably entrusted
to a woman. Even in the High Priest's palace it was so, as Simon Peter knew so
bitterly. Was it not the maid who kept the door there who had taunted him into
his base denial? How different was that porteress from Rhoda, for she had known
him by his voice and spurned him, but Rhoda when she heard it was so glad that
she was powerless in the very joy of it.
Rhoda Was Spiritually Liberated and Yet
Was Satisfied with Her Menial Tasks
That, however, is by the way. What I want you
to note just now is something different. It is how Rhoda, in spite of her new
sisterhood, was still active in her menial duty. Do you not think she felt in
these eleven years how the spirit of that home was altering? Was she not
conscious of a new kindness and regard as for a little sister for whom Jesus
died? Yet in spite of that and of the place it gave her and of the new
liberties that clustered round it, she was just as faithful to her humble task
as in the old days when she was nobody. Whatever her emancipation did, it did
not make her fretful at her post. She did not think that she could play the
mistress because for her and her mistress the one blood was shed. Rather I
think did Rhoda realize now, as she had never realized before, that the very
stamp and seal of Christian character is that one should be faithful in the
least. It is never a mark of a true Christian liberty that it makes us
discontented with our duty. It makes us discontented with ourselves, but never
with the task that God has given us. Nay, on the contrary it glorifies that
task, treats it as something that can be done for Christ's sake, and never
forgets that the Master whom it serves could find a kingdom in a mustard seed.
We Need the Example of Rhoda's Service
Now I think, friends, there are few truths
that need to be more pressed home today than that. If we need a great deal more
of Mary's love, we need a great deal more of Rhoda's service. I heard of a
theatre manager the other day who was talking to a friend about his
difficulties. And he said that one of the greatest of his difficulties was
this, to get people who would throw themselves into the humbler parts. He could
always get actors to take the leading roles and who thought themselves
perfectly competent to do it, but what troubled him was to get those who would
do well in obscure and insignificant positions. That is a complaint we hear on
every hand--a widespread unwillingness to do the lowlier services. And men lay
the blame of it on education and on the new ideas that have followed education.
But what we want is not less education: we shall never go back, please God, in
that direction. What we want with all progress and all emancipation is more of
the spirit of the Lord Jesus Christ. Do you think that there ever dwelt upon
our earth one with a grander outlook than our Lord had? You recall how He said,
"The Son shall make you free," and how He added, "Then are ye
free indeed." And yet with all that freedom which was His, that largeness
of heart as the sand of the seashore--how lovingly and how patiently He toiled
in the lowly ministry of Galilee. That is the spirit we still need if we are to
be saved from the perils of today. The boundaries of the past are being
trampled on. The fences around the fields are breaking down. And you may depend
upon it that with that enlargement there will be growing restlessness and
trouble, unless we learn from Christ as Rhoda learned the sacredness of common
duty. Samuel on the morning following his call opened the doors of the House of
the Lord as usual. Rhoda returned to the duty of the slave though lifted up in
Christ to be a sister. And Jesus, knowing that He came from God and went to
God, knowing His past and future on the throne, did what? took a towel and
girded Himself and washed His disciples' feet.
In Her Gladness She Forgot Her Duty to
Open the Door
But that is not the whole truth about
Rhoda, though it is true and we do well to ponder on it. The fact remains that
though not above her duty, yet she forgot her duty in her gladness. Like a
cautious maid she did not open at once. That would have been perilous at such
an hour. Someone was knocking and was knocking lustily, and she went to see if
it was friend or foe. And it was then she recognized the voice of Peter, and it
filled her with such an overmastering gladness that she was back in an instant
with the news, and left the door barred in Peter's face. There was something, I
take it, in Peter's voice that haunted the memory of those who heard it. And
Rhoda knew it well. Had she not heard him preaching? Had she not often let him
in before? And Peter would always have a word for her and always a smile of
greeting when he passed, all which I have a shrewd suspicion had been the means
of leading her to Christ. No wonder that her heart was rent in twain when she
heard that Peter was at the point of death. No wonder she was ecstatically glad
when she recognized his voice out in the street. And it is one of those touches
which none could ever counterfeit and which in themselves are worth a score of
arguments--to read that in the delirium of her joy she quite omitted to let
Peter in.
The Danger in Our Gladness to Forget the
Voices That Call from Without
Now, brethren, joy is a holy thing and
gladness is a commanded duty. "Rejoice in the Lord always," says
Paul, and, "again I say, Rejoice." There is a vast deal in the Gospel
we profess that tends to foster a glad and joyous spirit. It is glad to be
loved, and we are loved in Christ with a love that triumphs over sin and death.
Yet in all gladness when it is overflowing do we not recognize a certain
peril--the peril of forgetting just as Rhoda the voices that are calling from
without. People whose lives are uniformly happy are very rarely generous in
their sympathy. They do not understand; they have no eyes to see; they have no
ears to hear the voice that cries. It takes the touch of sorrow to give that,
and the bearing of burdens heavy to be borne, and the shadow that seems to bar
the sunshine out and yet is the shadow of the wing of God. I think that God
would give us far more happiness if He were only sure that we would use it
well. If we would only use it to make others happy we should have it in full
measure, running over. But there is something of Rhoda in us all, a tendency to
forget for very gladness, and so we can thank God as in the hymn we sang, that
our joys are touched with pain.
Rhoda Persisted
In closing shall we not notice this of
Rhoda, that she was not to be laughed out of her conviction. Let them say what
they would of the stranger at the gate, she constantly affirmed that it was
Peter. It was very strange they should have disbelieved her, for this was the
very thing they had been praying for. By night and day their prayers had been
ascending that Peter might be restored to them again. Yet when their prayers
were answered and he knocked and Rhoda came running to say that it was Simon, the
only thanks she got from that prayer meeting was to be plainly told that she
was mad. You see that people who attend prayer meetings can be pretty hasty in
their judgments sometimes. It was not courteous and it was not kindly: what is
more important still, it was not true. But we do not read that Rhoda lost her
temper or left the room peeved because they doubted her. She constantly
affirmed that it was so. She couldn't argue and she didn't try to. She showed
her wisdom when she didn't try to. It is not for a maid to argue with her
mistress, or for a mistress to argue with her maid. But mad or not mad, one
thing Rhoda knew, and that was that she had heard the voice of Peter, and I
honor her for the firm and steadfast way in which this girl adhered to her
convictions. There is another voice that some of us have heard. It is the voice
not of Peter, but of Peter's Lord. Long ago it may be, He stood at the door and
knocked, and we knew His voice and opened and let Him in. God give us all
something of Rhoda' s courage, that we too may be steadfast and immovable,
though every man and woman whom we meet with should mock at us just as they
mocked at her.
Comments
Post a Comment